Safety Contour doesn't help!? Insufficient depth soundings data in ECDIS on approaches to Chesapeake Bay

Nowadays mariners are well aware of the importance of anti-grounding function in ECDIS. It is well clear that any alarm emerged while route checking should be addressed seriously, especially if such alarm is relevant to the anti-grounding assessment. Here we wish to discuss one of such alarm occasions, which you may experience approaching the Chesapeake Bay in North America while heading to such ports as Baltimore or Norfolk.

Approximately in 30 nm from Chesapeake Bay Entrance Whistle Buoy (Lat. 36-56.1N; Long. 075-57.4W) true bearing 120° (ENC US3DE01M), there are some areas with isolated soundings of 146 m and deeper surrounded with 182 m contour. But if your route is laid through those areas you may notice an anti-grounding alarm on the ECDIS. You will see that those areas are marked as Shallow Water even if your Shallow and Safety Contours are set well below 182 m. Why does it happen? 

It happens because information on the chart is insufficient. Within the contour depth values may be anywhere from 0 to 182m, which means that something there may be reaching up to the water level!

Basically, because there is only one distinctive contour on the chart, any Safety Contour setting below 182 m (even 1 m) will highlight this contour (182) and fill the area within it with blue color. In our case Safety Countour = Safety Depth = 10 m. Also, note that ENC compilation scale is 1:350 000 and ZOC category is "C" (part of the display to the right on the picture below).

Read more about ZOC categories in this article. 

Why did we come to the conclusion that information on this chart is insufficient? 

Because, if you have a look on the ENC US4NC32M (left part of the display) with compilation scale 1:80 000 and ZOC A1 Safety Contour is not highlighted at all.

This means that in this area there is no depth less than 10 m (at least on the larger scale chart) as it shown on the screenshot below.

Also, the raster chart for this area gives the same information:

The appropriate hydrographic office will be informed via contracted Chart Supplier about those findings. Meanwhile, it is recommended to perform Passage Planning in this area with particular attention, carefully checking chart information with relevant ECDIS tool.   

Learn more about ECDIS Safety Settings with our ECDIS Awareness course. 
26 December 2018

Our courses

Resilience in Maritime Industry

Oil Record Book - Part 1

Marine Electrical Equipment for Hazardous Areas

Electrical, electronic and control engineering

US EPA Vessel General Permit

Ship Security Duties

Passage Planning with ECDIS

ECDIS Awareness

Basics of Navigation

Ship Security Officer

Ship Security Awareness


Maritime Cyber Security Awareness

Ballast Water Management

Dangerous Goods

Mooring System Management

Safety Officer

Marine Incident Investigation

Risk Assessment

Behavior-Based Safety


Related articles

Sharing knowledge of Marine Engineering

Sharing knowledge of Marine Engineering

Dear marine engineers, electro-technical officers, and cadets of mentioned specialties. With the purpose of knowledge sharing in the field of marine electrical equipment, electronic and control...

19 November 2019
How often EPIRB and SART Tests shall be done on board?

How often EPIRB and SART Tests shall be done on board?

It seems to be a very simple question, but sometimes we may get misguided by contradicting statements in different sources. The problem is that unnecessary self-testing of this equipment can reduce...

26 January 2019
Are you ready to cope with 2018 NI Certification Standard for DPO?

Are you ready to cope with 2018 NI Certification Standard for DPO?

In February 2018 the Nautical Institute (NI) published a new version of Dynamic Positioning Accreditation and Certification Standard, which consists of two volumes: ( - ) Training and...

9 December 2018